03 Messaging & Positioning
The Explanation
Problem
Growth slows when understanding stays internal.
The explanation chain
Complexity
Product is genuinely sophisticated
Unclear message
Complexity communicated instead of value
Weak trust
Market can't understand enough to believe
Slower growth
Sales, hiring, and partnership all affected
Most companies with slow growth have an explanation problem, not an awareness problem. More distribution to an unclear explanation makes the problem larger — not smaller.
Why this matters
Many companies mistake an explanation problem for an awareness problem — and invest in the wrong fix.
When growth is slow, the most common diagnosis is awareness: not enough people know about the product. The investment response is distribution: more content, more outreach, more advertising, more channels. Sometimes this is the right diagnosis. Often it isn't.
An explanation problem looks identical to an awareness problem from the outside: pipeline is thin, inbound is low, conversations don't convert. But the cause is different. The product is reaching people — but they're not understanding it. They encounter the homepage, the pitch, or the content, and leave with an impression too vague to act on.
Treating an explanation problem as an awareness problem is expensive: every additional person reached forms the same confused impression and disengages. The distribution investment amplifies the explanation gap rather than closing it. The correct diagnosis — explanation problem, not awareness problem — produces a fundamentally different and significantly more effective response.
Founder reality
Diagnose explanation versus awareness before the next growth investment:
When people who've encountered the company don't convert, do they say they need to think about it (explanation problem) or that they haven't heard enough (awareness problem)?
When the founder explains the product in a one-on-one conversation, does the conversion rate improve dramatically compared to other touchpoints — and what does that gap reveal?
Are there people in the target market who are actively searching for solutions to the problem we solve — and are they finding us but not converting?
What do non-converting prospects say when asked what they understood about the product — and does that match what the company intended to communicate?
If the explanation were perfect — if every prospect who encountered the company understood it fully — what would the conversion rate be?
The founder explanation gap is the most diagnostic test. If the founder's 1:1 explanation converts dramatically better than all other touchpoints, the explanation problem is real — and the founder's explanation is the raw material for fixing it.
The diagnostic
Three ways to distinguish an explanation problem from an awareness problem
Use all three tests. The pattern across them reveals which problem is primary.
01
The comprehension test — what does the market understand after a standard encounter
Test 8–10 people in the target audience profile with the standard explanation (homepage, pitch deck, or marketing material). Ask: what does this company do? Who is it for? What makes it different? The gap between what they describe and what the company intends to communicate is the explanation gap. If it's large, the problem is explanation. If it's small, the problem may be awareness.
02
The conversion differential — does comprehension level predict conversion
Compare conversion rates for prospects who received a 1:1 explanation (typically a founder or senior sales conversation) versus prospects who converted (or didn't) through self-service materials. A large differential — much higher conversion in 1:1 contexts — confirms an explanation problem. The 1:1 is compensating for the weakness of the standard explanation.
03
The exit interview — what non-converting prospects understood and believed
Interview 8–10 prospects who did not convert after a standard touchpoint. Ask what they understood about the product, what they believed about the company, and what would have needed to be different for them to proceed. The answers reveal whether non-conversion was driven by weak understanding (explanation problem) or correct understanding combined with a fit or price decision (not an explanation problem).
Common mistakes
01
Increasing distribution without testing comprehension first
Every growth investment decision should be preceded by a comprehension test. If comprehension is weak, distribution investment amplifies the weakness. Test first. Invest after.
02
Treating the founder's pitch as the standard explanation
The founder's pitch is almost always significantly more effective than the company's standard explanation — because the founder understands the product most deeply and adapts in real time. The standard explanation should be engineered to close the gap to the founder's pitch, not to stand independently of it.
03
Fixing the symptom (low conversion) without diagnosing the cause (explanation or awareness)
Adding a free trial, reducing price, or restructuring the sales process are responses to low conversion that don't address the explanation or awareness cause. Fixing the cause produces more durable improvement than fixing the symptom.
04
No explanation quality measurement
If explanation quality is never measured — comprehension tested, conversion differentials tracked, exit interviews conducted — the problem is invisible. Make explanation quality a measured variable, not an assumed constant.
Example scenario
A Series A security infrastructure company. Significant content investment for 8 months. Pipeline: thin. Leadership diagnosis: awareness problem. Recommended fix: double the content budget.
The diagnosis test
Comprehension test: 8 target-profile prospects shown the website and recent content for 5 minutes. Asked to describe the company.
Average description: 'a security company that does something with infrastructure monitoring'. Zero of 8 could describe the specific differentiation.
Conversion differential: founder-led demos converted at 67%. Marketing-qualified leads converted at 11%.
Diagnosis: explanation problem, not awareness problem. The content was reaching people. The content wasn't explaining the product.
The explanation fix
Founder pitch recorded and transcribed. The specific phrases that produced the strongest prospect responses identified.
Those phrases incorporated into the homepage, the content, and the demo script.
Comprehension test repeated after 6 weeks of revised explanation.
The outcome
Comprehension test (8 new participants): 6 of 8 accurately described the specific differentiation. Marketing-qualified lead conversion: improved from 11% to 28%. The content budget stayed the same. The explanation changed. The explanation problem was the growth problem — and fixing it produced the results that doubling the budget would not have.
Takeaway
Diagnose explanation versus awareness before investing in distribution.
Test comprehension. Measure the founder-versus-standard conversion differential. Interview non-converting prospects. If the problem is explanation, fix the explanation. More distribution to a weak explanation makes the problem more expensive — not smaller.
Related thinking
Messaging & Positioning
Why Nobody Understands Your Product
Strong products are often badly explained.
Messaging & Positioning
Messaging Before Marketing
Good messaging makes marketing easier.
Messaging & Positioning
The Message Friction Problem
Small misunderstandings quietly slow growth.
Continue reading
Messaging Before Marketing